This week in North Philly Notes, the editors of Good Reasons to Run describe their new book, a collection of essays about women with political ambition.
2018 saw a record number of women run for public office in the U.S. If current trends continue, 2020 may break those records. The numbers of women’s political candidacies are soaring — at least, on the Democratic side of the aisle. And in this moment of crisis, women leaders have emerged as heroes in many countries.
Yet women historically and even in the recent past few decades have been reluctant to declare themselves political candidates. Even when more qualified, women lag way behind similarly-situated men in “political ambition,” the desire to run for or hold office.
How do scholars make sense of the long-term trend of men showing more political ambition, but also account for the recent spikes in women running? Why have the gains been so one-sided in terms of party, with Republican women falling further and further behind? How might answers to these questions differ if we look at racial subgroups or at women outside the U.S.?
This timely collection of research essays explores these and other questions through a five-part structure, with top scholars in the women and politics field presenting original research. For those interested, there is an extensive methodological appendix online, with entries for many of the chapters. But the editors and contributors to this volume wanted it to be useful to the public as well as to scholars, and they present the research findings in an accessible, narrative style. (For a sample from the editors’ Introduction, click here.)
Ultimately this book speaks to the power of context, motivation, recruitment, and assistance (especially financial) in helping women become candidates. Political ambition, it concludes, is not something with which most candidates are simply born; it is often created (or not), nurtured (or not), and brought to fruition (or not) by specific factors in the campaign environment. Each of the 18 substantive chapters illuminate certain of these factors through new research, according to five main themes (“Who Runs?,” “Why Run?,” “Why Not Run?”, “How Nonprofits Help Women Run for Office,” and “The Special Role of Money”). Together these investigations help us understand how and why people become candidates, with a special focus on gender and with some attention also to race-gender intersectionality, the role of party, and the question of how we might encourage a more diverse crop of candidates in both parties in the future.
Filed under: american studies, gender studies, History, political science, sociology, transnational politics, women's studies | Tagged: campaigns, candidacy, Democrats, leadership, politics, public office, republicans, scholarship, women |
Leave a Reply